<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>infojustice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infojustice.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infojustice.org</link>
	<description>Open Access and Information Justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TAFTA: First Step Towards a Super-ACTA</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29734</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29734#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[La Quadrature du Net (CC-BY-SA)(Link)] In a plenary vote, the European Parliament just adopted a mandate to the European Commission explicitly allowing it to “include strong protection of intellectual property rights (IPR)” in the proposed EU-US trade agreement negotiations, the “Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement” (TAFTA), also know as “Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership” (TTIP). Remaining <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29734' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29734/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Brazilian Congress Needs To Pass Marco Civil for Brazilians &#8211; and The World</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29726</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29726#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carolina Rossini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Civil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carolina Rossini is Project Director, Latin America Resource Center, New America Foundation Tim Berners-Lee’s visit to Brazil last week has rekindled hopes for a civil society frustrated by six postponed votes on the bill known as “Marco Civil.” This groundbreaking federal legislation would guarantee civil rights in the use of the Internet, and is sometimes <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29726' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29726/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Democrats Urge Obama Administration to Give Poorest Countries More Time to Adhere to WTO Intellectual Property Rules</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29714</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29714#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Representatives Waxman, Lee, DeLauro, Schakowsky, and Bass have sent a letter to Acting U.S. Trade Representative Demetrios Marantis supporting a proposal by Haiti to allow poor countries extra time to enact stronger rules on patent, copyrights, and other forms of intellectual property. The issue involves the implementation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29714' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29714/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Proposal to Ban Special 301 Adjudication</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29701</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29701#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special 301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For many non-U.S. parties and public interest advocates, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) intellectual property chapter is seen primarily as a threat. It is the latest step in a long running agenda to shift between policy making forums to achieve new global &#8220;maximalist&#8221; intellectual property policies that are not achievable in multilateral forums. This narrative <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29701' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29701/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LDC Watch and OWINFS on the TRIPS Council Chair to Stop the Ongoing Unfair Informal Negotiations on the LDC TRIPS Waiver Extension</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29691</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29691#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact:   Arjun Karki, akarki@ldcwatch.org , +977 9851023254 Prerna Bomzan, prerna@ldcwatch.org , +977 9841209336 Deborah James, djames@cepr.net , +1 (202) 441 6917 On 20 May, global civil society networks LDC Watch and the Our World Is Not For Sale (OWINFS) wrote an open letter of protest to the Ambassador of Panama, Alfredo Suescum <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29691' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29691/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes in U.S. Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Proposal Needed to Accommodate Copyright Policy Proposals</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29689</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29689#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limitations & Exceptions to Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limitations and Exceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positive Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Trans Pacific Partnership creeps toward an end game (which appears far off) it may be worth spending more time discussing positive proposals for amending the proposal in various ways. I have previously written on ideas for positive proposals from the perspective of the non-U.S. parties, both in the form of a short list <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29689' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29689/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>English Translation of the New Colombian Copyright Bill (no. 306)</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29697</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29697#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ley Lleras 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carolina Botero has sent us an English translation of the new copyright legislation that was recently proposed in Colombia to replace the controversial &#8220;Ley Lleras 2.0&#8243; law that was struck down earlier last year by the Constitutional Court.  The law is meant intended to bring Colombia into compliance with the IP provisions i its FTA <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29697' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29697/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bracing for Another Delay: Open Innovation At the WHO?</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29676</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29676#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sophie Bloeman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[HAI Europe]  Open innovation, open access, crowd-sourcing innovation, innovation prizes&#8230;. All buzzwords we often hear in the media, employed by entrepreneurs, government officials or science journalists. The terms have become part of the discourse on innovation and science: companies crowd source their data and innovation, governments are opening up their data to allow for civic <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29676' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29676/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Letter to the Chair of the TRIPS Council, Alfredo Suescum, Ambassador of Panama to the WTO</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29667</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29667#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our World Is Not for Sale (OWINFS) Network and LDC Watch. Dear Ambassador Suescum, We are outraged with the manner in which informal consultations are being conducted on the issue of extension of the LDC’s transition period. We find the current process to be unfair and prejudicial to the interests of the LDCs, the poorest <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29667' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29667/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live from the Trans Pacific Partnership: IP Chapter Shows No Sign of Resolution, End of Negotiation in 2013 Highly Unlikely</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29657</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29657#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LIMA – There is a strong sense in the halls of the current TPP negotiation that the end is not in sight. And one of the primary reasons for the blocked progress is a lack of consensus on intellectual property and pharmaceuticals issues. Officially, the Chief Negotiators have backed off the prior commitment to end <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29657' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29657/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colombian Government Presents Again Bill 1520 Without Citizen Participation</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29639</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29639#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carolina Botero</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ley Lleras2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday while celebrating the Internet day the government introduced a Bill, reproducing essentially the text of the former Law1520 (Ley Lleras 2) before the Congress. Despite the several citizen claims (last one) to open a civil dialogue when implementing the US FTA obligations before taking them to parliament, and after 3 failed attemtps to reform the <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29639' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29639/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Colombian Copyright Legislation Introduced &#8211; How Does It Compare to Ley Lleras 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29633</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29633#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrés Izquierdo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ley Lleras 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last May 17th a new copyright bill was resubmitted in the Colombian Congress as part of the implementation of the FTA with the United States. The new Bill is introduced as a replacement to the 1520 Act of 2012 (Ley Lleras 2.0), law that was struck down last January by the Constitutional Court (Case C11-13) <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29633' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29633/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NZ-born Fair Deal Coalition Gets Global Makeover</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29645</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29645#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Susan Chalmers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Published on behalf of the Fair Deal Coalition, of which InternetNZ is a member. [internetnz.net.nz, (CC-BY)]  The Fair Deal Coalition announces that it is ramping up its presence with a global publicity and education campaign that will raise awareness of intellectual property rights proposals in the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). A new website – www.ourfairdeal.org <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29645' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29645/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright policymaking and the digital public domain: a bitter-sweet wishful thinking from France</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29651</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29651#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Posted to the  Communia blog by Anne-Catherine Lorrain, (CC0 1.0)] The mission on culture at the digital era commissioned by the French government and supervised by Pierre Lescure, rather pompously entitled ‘Acte II de l’exception culturelle’, released its report this week in Paris: ‘Rapport sur la politique culturelle à l’ère des contenus numériques’, downloadable in <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29651' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29651/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trans Pacific Partnership Negotiations and the Controversial Issue of Pharmaceutical Test Data Protection</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29616</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29616#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trade negotiators are meeting in Lima, Peru this week for the seventeenth round of talks on the proposed Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP).  The negotiations are reaching the final stages as an October deadline approaches, and the most controversial topics have been pushed to the end. The intersection of intellectual property and access to medicines is <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29616' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29616/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Power Unbound: Investor-State Arbitration of IP Monopolies on Medicines – Eli Lilly and the TPP</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29612</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29612#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Working-Paper-Series</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PIJIP Research Paper no. 2013-1 Author:  Brook Baker Abstract:  Free trade agreements (FTAs) and bilateral investment treaties (BITs) typically contain investment clauses designed to attract direct foreign investment and protect the interests of foreign investors. In addition to defining foreign investment that are entitled to protection, investment clauses typically allow for investor-state dispute resolution, which <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29612' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29612/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s Congressional Testimony on Copyright Reform Will Address Excessive Penalties for Consumers</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29599</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29599#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today at 2pm EST, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet will hold the first hearing to address copyright reform since the announcement by Chairman Goodlatte of a comprehensive review of U.S. copyright law. Prepared witness statements are available, and the hearing webcast will be up on the hearing&#8217;s webpage. This <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29599' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29599/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latin American Generics Association ALIFAR Announces Engagement in Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Advocacy Against TRIPS-plus IP Policies</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29598</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29598#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buenos Aires (May 16, 2013). ALIFAR, the Latin American generic pharmaceutical association, released a press release today announcing that it &#8220;decided to collectively support their associations from Chile, Mexico and Peru during TPP negotiations.&#8221; The announcement follows a three day meeting in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. The release recounts that ALIFAR has issued a statement <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29598' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29598/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WIPO Treaty for the Visually Impaired Flounders</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29582</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29582#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sara Bannerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIP Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wipo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As negotiators at WIPO prepare for a June 17-22 diplomatic conference in Marrakesh to create a new international instrument/treaty for the benefit of the visually impaired.  The treaty is intended, by its proponents, to make copyright works more accessible to the visually impaired.  It is currently estimated that only 5% of works are available in <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29582' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29582/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright in France: Wishful Thinking and Real Dangers</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29576</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29576#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HADOPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[La Quadrature du Net, Link (CC-BY-SA)]  Pierre Lescure has handed in his report [fr] on culture at the digital era to French President François Hollande1. La Quadrature du Net denounces a flawed political process revealing the harmful influence of industrial groups at all levels of policy-making. How will the French government react to Lescure&#8217;s proposal <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29576' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29576/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open A.I.R. Conference on Innovation and Intellectual Property in Africa; and 3rd Global Congress on IP &amp; the Public Interest</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29567</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29567#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9-13 December 2013, Cape Town, South Africa In December 2013, delegates from national and international governmental entities, the private sector, civil society, and academia will gather for five days of interconnected events in Cape Town. Participants will engage with diverse perspectives and future scenarios for intellectual property (IP), innovation and development during the Open A.I.R. Conference <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29567' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29567/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Listing Ukraine as a Priority Foreign Country in Special 301 Violates the World Trade Organization Agreements</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29556</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29556#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bilateral Trade Pressures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special 301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Disputes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this year’s Special 301 report, the United States Trade Representative listed Ukraine as a “Priority Foreign Country” (aka PFC), triggering a 30 day countdown to initiate an investigation under Section 301 of the Trade Act to determine trade sanctions. 19 USC 2412(2)(A). This is only the second time that the U.S. has threatened a <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29556' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29556/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excerpts of Comments to USTR on Copyright and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29557</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29557#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TTIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAFTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By last Friday, 347 comments had been submitted to the US Trade Representative in response to its Request for Comments on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Agreement (TTIP).  Numerous comments addressed intellectual property concerns (and many suggested that IPRs should be left out of the agreement all together).   Also, many comments highlighted the need <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29557' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29557/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Interaction of the Proposed LDC Extension Request and the 2016 Pharmaceutical Product Extension</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29548</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29548#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brook Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current request of WTO LDC Members for an unconditional extension of the time period within which they must become compliant with the TRIPS Agreement covers all forms of intellectual property protection under TRIPS.  Even though it is true that some LDCs have signed other treaties that might impose some IP obligations, e.g., the Paris <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29548' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29548/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright and Secrecy Don’t Make for Good Trade Agreements</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29545</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29545#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 17:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rashmi Rangnath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TTIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Public Knowledge (Link)(CC-BY-SA]  Today we filed comments about the proposed United States-European Union Free Trade Agreement – the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). We told the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) that copyright is an uncomfortable fit for a trade agreement and should be kept out of the TTIP. If the <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29545' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29545/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Releases Historic Open Data Rules to Enhance Government Efficiency and Fuel Economic Growth</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29533</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29533#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 15:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Positive Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[White House press release, May 9, 2013]  The Obama Administration today took groundbreaking new steps to make information generated and stored by the Federal Government more open and accessible to innovators and the public, to fuel entrepreneurship and economic growth while increasing government transparency and efficiency. Today’s actions—including an Executive Order signed by the President <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29533' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29533/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incoming WTO Director General Urged to Make Access to Medicines a Priority</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29520</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29520#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specail 301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Least-developed countries fighting for TRIPS exemption extension [MSF Press Release]  On the appointment of Roberto Azevedo as Director General of the World Trade Organization, international medical humanitarian organisation Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has warned the WTO and incoming DG that access to medicines must become a priority. This includes allowing least-developed countries to remain exempt <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29520' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29520/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Pharmaceutical Firms Invest More Heavily in Countries with Data Exclusivity?</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29512</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29512#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data exclusivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Forthcoming paper, Summer 2013, Currents International Trade Law Journal]   Abstract:   Countries may choose various methods of data protection in order to comply with the TRIPS Agreement. Policymakers should consider the effects of data exclusivity on prices and investment relative to other types of data protection. The data presented here suggest there is no relationship <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29512' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29512/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the UK abolished copyright? Analysis of new orphan work legislation</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29503</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29503#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andres Guadamuz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[technollama.co.uk (Link)(CC-BY-NC-SA)] Has the UK abolished copyright law with the passing of orphan works legislation? I’ll answer quickly with Betteridge’s Law of Headlines: NO. However, if you listen to some copyright maximalist outlets, and particularly to the photograph lobby, you would believe that all copyright has been abolished as of now. Just look at some <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29503' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29503/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USTR Announcements and Deadlines for Public Comments on the TPP and TTIP</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29496</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29496#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the U.S. Trade Representative issued a Federal Register Notice seeking &#8220;comments from the public on all issues related to Japan&#8217;s participation in the TPP negotiations [and] comments on negotiations to address certain non-tariff measures of Japan that will be conducted bilaterally in parallel to the TPP negotiations and addressed by the conclusion of the <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29496' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29496/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Government Special 301 &#8220;Watchlist&#8221; and Developing Country Use of Compulsory Licenses for Healthcare</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29493</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29493#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 16:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Maybarduk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Special 301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Special 301 is an annual report by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) which places countries on a “watch list” if USTR would like to see greater changes in their intellectual property rules or enforcement practice. This year’s report came out May 1st. We pay attention because USTR relies heavily on comments from <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29493' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29493/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29487</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29487#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 16:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Geist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limitations & Exceptions to Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair dealing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Posted to michaelgeist.ca (CC-BY)(Link)]  Copyright cases typically only reach the Supreme Court of Canada once every few years, ensuring that each case is carefully parsed and analyzed. As readers of this blog know, on July 12, 2012, the Supreme Court issued rulings on five copyright cases in a single day, an unprecedented tally that shook <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29487' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29487/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Africa&#8217;s  Department of Trade and Industry Reneges on IP Policy Commitments</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29481</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29481#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Afrca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Posted on FixthePatentLaws.org (Link)]  On 24 April 2013, Minister of Trade and Industry Rob Davies stated that South Africa’s new intellectual property (IP) policy would not be released for public comment any time soon. This starkly contrasts with a number of promises in the past two years, by both the Minister and officials in the <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29481' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29481/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special 301 and Access to Medicines under the Obama Administration</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29472</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29472#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special 301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Disputes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first Obama campaign for the presidency reached out to access to medicines campaigners to join the broad coalition he was building to gain the presidency. In response to their concerns, he declared that his presidency would “break the stranglehold that a few big drug and insurance companies have on these life-saving drugs,” and pledged <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29472' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29472/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USTR Special 301 Attacks Indian Novartis Ruling &#8211; WTO Director General Defends It</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29456</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29456#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special 301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USTR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a quick note about one of the items in this year&#8217;s Special 301 Report, released by USTR this morning. The report attacks the recent Indian Novartis ruling in unusually direct language.  The ruling upheld the denial of a patent on Glivec for failing to meet patentability requirements under Section 3(d) of the Indian <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29456' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29456/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Special 301? A Historical Primer</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29465</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29465#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special 301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Disputes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the diverse sources from which the international intellectual property regime emanates is an annual unilateral adjudication of foreign government trade policies by the United States under the so-called “Special 301” program and report. For over two decades the report has functioned as one of the primary sticks for the U.S.’s “carrot and stick” <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29465' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29465/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statutory Damages: A Rarity in Copyright Laws Internationally, But for How Long?</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29458</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29458#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Authors: Pamela Samuelson, Phil Hill, and Tara Wheatland Publisher: Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.(Forthcoming) Abstract:  American copyright professionals may be so accustomed to the current domestic regime of statutory damages that it may come as a surprise to learn that very few countries in the world have anything comparable. Our survey of <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29458' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29458/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislation on Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright Under Debate in Colombia</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29450</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29450#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marcela Palacio Puerta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ley Lleras2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Colombian Parliament is debating Bill 001 of 2012.[1] This Bill contains provisions regarding limitation and exceptions to Copyright Law. Last 16 of April the Bill passed the second debate in the House of Representatives. Now it is pending for debate in the Senate. This Bill contains six articles regarding limitations and exceptions. Article 1 <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29450' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29450/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US and EU Demand TRIPS-Plus Concession from Poorest Countries</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29444</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29444#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sangeeta-Shashikant</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Developed countries, particularly the United States and the European Union, have offered a poor and impractical deal of an incredibly short extension of 5 years with restrictive conditions to least developed countries that are entitled to be exempted from implementing the WTO TRIPS Agreement. Particularly problematic is their demand that the LDCs agree to a <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29444' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29444/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Academics&#8217; Expert Letter on LDC Extension</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29438</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29438#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brook Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 130 academics from around the world have signed a letter supporting the unconditional extension of the transition period within which least development country Members of the WTO must become fully compliant with the TRIPS Agreement until any such country ceases to be a least developed country. The letter articulates 10 reasons supporting the proposed <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29438' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29438/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Op-ed on Publisher Lawsuit Against Delhi University:  Why Students Need the Right to Copy</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29421</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29421#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Limitations & Exceptions to Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Stories from Other Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Shamnad Basheer]  Late last year, leading publishing houses including Oxford University Press and Cambridge University Press brought a copyright action against Delhi University and a tiny photocopy shop licensed by it, seeking to restrain them from supplying educational course packs to students. This lawsuit sent shock waves across the academic community, leading more than 300 <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29421' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29421/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisiting USTR&#8217;s Negotiating Objectives in New Trade Promotion Authority Legislation</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29413</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29413#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pressure on Capitol Hill for Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) is growing. TPA – called “fasttrack” in the 1990s when it was used to negotiate NAFTA – allows the executive branch to negotiate trade agreements that Congress cannot amend during the ratification process.  It also sets procedural rules under which trade agreements are negotiated, and the <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29413' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29413/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human Rights and Access to Medicines Cases</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29409</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29409#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Flynn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP and Human Rigths]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Friday I attended a workshop at Yale Law School Global Health Justice Partnership to discuss the end product of a clinical project exploring human rights strategies to promote access to medicine. (This is a long term interest of mine. PIJIP held a conference and workshop on IP and Human Rights in February, I teach <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29409' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29409/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Campaign for a Progressive Copyright Law in Uzbekistan</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29403</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29403#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uzbekistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[EIFL press release (CC-BY)]  On the occasion of World Intellectual Property Day with the theme &#8220;Creativity: the next generation&#8221;, EIFL is pleased to publish the fourth in a series of case studies with the results of advocacy campaigns in support of copyright law reform in EIFL partner countries. Every day, libraries in all parts of the <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29403' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29403/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EP Trade Committee Rejects Meaningful TTIP Amendments</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29430</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29430#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Ante Wessells, posted to FFII.org (link) (CC-BY-SA)]  Today the European Parliament International Trade committee voted on a draft resolution on the EU – US trade agreement (TTIP / TAFTA). La Quadrature du Net summarizes it: EU Parliament Opens The Door to Copyright Repression in TAFTA. The INTA committee could have voted meaningful amendments into the <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29430' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29430/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Goodlatte Announces &#8220;Comprehensive&#8221; Review of U.S. Copyright Law</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29395</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29395#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte announced an upcoming review of U.S. copyright law:   &#8220;the House Judiciary Committee will hold a comprehensive series of hearings on U.S. copyright law in the months ahead. The goal of these hearings will be to determine whether the laws are still working in the digital age. I <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29395' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29395/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investors’ IP Rights Unbound:  The Danger of Investment Clauses to Access to Medicines</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29388</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29388#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brook Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Cross posted from Equilibri.net] Although access to medicines activists have been wise to focus our attention intently on convincing low- and middle-income countries to adopt and use all possible TRIPS-compliant flexibilities and to oppose the TRIPS-plus IP chapters in free trade agreements, we have neglected to interrogate another chapter in free trade agreements and bilateral <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29388' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29388/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the EU Parliament Let TAFTA Turn Into Another ACTA?</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29383</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29383#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[La Quadrature du Net, Link (CC-BY-SA)] On 25 April next, the “International Trade” (INTA) committee of the European Parliament will vote on a draft resolution on the proposed EU-US trade agreement, the “Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement” (TAFTA), also touted as the “Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership” (TTIP). After the ACTA, SOPA, PIPA and CETA fights, <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29383' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29383/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Korean Copyright Reform Bill, and Opposition from the Copyright Industries</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29378</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29378#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heesob Nam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Strikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may well know the three-strikes-out rule was first enacted in S. Korea in 2009. Also this country introduced in 2006 a filtering obligation upon P2P and cyberlocker service providers. In January, Mr. Choi introduced a bill to entirely remove those notorious rules from the Korean Copyright Act. This provoked strong oppositions from the <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29378' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29378/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Academics&#8217; Expert Letter on LDCs&#8217; TRIPS Extension Request</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29370</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29370#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brook Baker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several of IP justice academics are soliciting signatures from legal and other academics around the world who focus on human rights, intellectual property, trade, and development and who are in favor of the request by WTO least developed country Members that they be granted  an extension of the time period within which they must become <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29370' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29370/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ministers&#8217; Statement Indicates Japan Will Soon Join TPP Negotiations; Peru Opens Registration for 17th TPP Round</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29366</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29366#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trade Ministers of the eleven countries negotiating the Trans Pacific Partnership held a side meeting at the APEC summit in Indonesia last week.  They issued a statement in which they agreed to keep working on outstanding issues (including IP), and indicated that Japan is closer to joining the negotiations.  The statement specifically says that &#8220;each <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29366' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29366/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WIPO Talks on the Treaty for the Blind Disappoint Countries and Advocates Alike</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29359</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29359#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Palmedo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multilateral Fora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO. VIP Treaty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 20, WIPO held a meeting to prepare a text for the final deliberations on the treaty on copyright exceptions for Visually Impaired People.  IP Watch reports that many of the countries seemed worried that there were too many areas left undecided, or even sliding &#8220;backward,&#8221; as the Honduras delegation warned.  Some worried that <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29359' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29359/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the Digital Public Library of America</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29351</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29351#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 11:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Dan Cohen, Executive Director, (Announcement on DPLA site)] It’s not very often you get to build a new library. Together, that’s what we will begin to do today.  Starting with over two million items, each with its own special story and significance, the Digital Public Library of America will now begin to assemble the riches <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29351' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29351/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libraries in Estonia Take to the National Airwaves with Copyright</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29344</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29344#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Case Study:  Copyright Debate in Estonia Project Manager: Karmen Linask Copyright Specialist, National Library of Estonia Results of an EIFL-IP funded project (Link)  [CC-BY] Download Case Study as a PDF In January 2013, libraries in Estonia took to the national airwaves with “Digital Memory”, a capacity-filled seminar where libraries presented their newly developed position on <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29344' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29344/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A la demande générale, nous avons traduit en français le manuel sur l’usage loyal et  l’utilisation équitable</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29329</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29329#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Band</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Limitations & Exceptions to Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[By popular demand, we have created a French version of the Fair Use/Fair Dealing Handbook]  Plus de 40 pays, qui comptent plus du tiers de la population mondiale, ont inscrit des dispositions d’usage loyal ou d’utilisation équitable dans leur législation sur le droit d’auteur. Ils sont dans toutes les régions du monde et à tous les <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29329' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29329/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Novartis Decision: A Tale Of Developing Countries, IP, And The Role Of The Judiciary</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29311</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29311#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Abdel Latif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3(d)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Cross posted from Inside Views: IP-Watch, (CC-BY-NC-ND)]Much – if not everything – has been said about the health innovation and access to medicines impact of the recent decision of the Indian Supreme Court (SC) in the Novartis case. But there are broader implications. The ruling is also a revealing tale about the changing role of <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29311' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29311/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statement from Malaysian Public Health Organizations Opposing the Trans Pacific Partnership</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29306</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29306#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Signed by 19 public health groups.  Available here as a printable PDF] Generic medicines save lives by preventing, curing and managing non-communicable and communicable diseases for all Malaysians, especially the lower-income and marginalised groups. The United States via the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) is demanding strict provisions that will reduce access to these affordable medicines. We <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29306' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29306/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convocatoria a Charlas (Cumbre Mundial de Creative Commons)</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29321</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29321#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Creative Commons Colombia (Link) (CC-BY)]La Cumbre Mundial de Creative Commons, que se realizará este año en Buenos Aires – Argentina, lanzó oficialmente la Convocatoria a Sesiones y Charlas, que harán parte del programa principal de la Cumbre. “Los asistentes a la cumbre discutirán las estrategias para fortalecer Creative Commons y su comunidad en todo el <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29321' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29321/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade Agreement with Singapore Secret Until It Enters Into Force</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29298</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29298#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[FFII press release (CC-NY-SA)]  The EU Commission decided to keep the trade agreement with Singapore secret until it enters into force. With this decision the Commission betrays European citizens and democracy, according to the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII). In December 2012 EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht and Singapore&#8217;s Minister of Trade <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29298' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29298/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attack on affordable medicines continues in EU-India trade negotiations</title>
		<link>http://infojustice.org/archives/29287</link>
		<comments>http://infojustice.org/archives/29287#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>REPOST</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU-India Free Trade Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infojustice.org/?p=29287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health groups rally in Delhi as protests spread across the developing world. [Posted on the Don't Trade Our Lives Away blog, 10 April, 2013, New Delhi]  Thousands of people living with HIV, cancer patient groups &#38; public health activists rallied on the streets of Delhi today calling on the Indian government to reject the EU’s demands <a href='http://infojustice.org/archives/29287' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infojustice.org/archives/29287/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: infojustice.org @ 2013-05-23 18:07:38 by W3 Total Cache -->