We thank and appreciate the interest of the office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) in allowing us to participate in the Special 301 hearing. We remain hopeful that our impartial, expert contribution to the process will assist the USTR’s efforts in assessing the legality of India’s intellectual property protections under binding international law and determining whether it is being deployed in an illegal protectionist manner against U.S. right holders.
Follow
Free to Share
Comments on:
- An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.
Civil Society Documents
- An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.
Comments on:
- An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.
industry | infojustice
- Aspen Doesn’t Want You to Own Your Own Casebooks
- Still Profitable After All These Years
- Recording Industry Reports Growth from User-Generated Content and New Projects in Emerging Economies
- EC Trade Negotiators and Industry Discuss How to ‘Re-Educate’ Public About Intellectual Property Rights (talk about employment)
- Witnesses at U.S. Trade Hearing Offer Opinions (and Warnings) on Intellectual Property in Upcoming Negotiations with the EU