Nov 142013
 
Image: Lumin Consulting for EFF (CC-BY)

Image: Lumin Consulting for EFF (CC-BY)

In the midst of the controversy surrounding the release of a Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) negotiating text on intellectual property by Wikileaks yesterday, over 80 law professors of intellectual property law and related disciplines have written to President Obama, Members of Congress and the United States Trade Representative calling for the creation of a public process to vet the TPP’S intellectual property proposals.

The letter specifically notes that “even in light of yesterday’s release by WikiLeaks,” public debate on the agreement’s proposals “beyond speculation would be impossible since there has not been any official release of text.”

It continues:

“Nor does yesterday’s leaked text solve the problem of transparency and accountability since it is both unofficial and perhaps out-of-date. It should be (and remains) the role of our government, and not leakers, to create public dialogue by sharing the accurate and current informational foundations required for meaningful public input.”

Many of the letters’ signatories might support an ultimate TPP agreement and are supporters and practitioners in the field of international intellectual property law. But they state their collective fear that continuing to follow a closed process where the public is informed only through leaks will doom the agreement to the fate of the last secretly negotiated intellectual property agreement – the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).

Like TPP, ACTA was negotiated under unprecedented secrecy with the public informed of its contents manly through leaks. The result of the secretive process was rising public distrust, erupting in mass protests and criticism upon the finalization of the agreement. The EU parliament followed with a rejection of ACTA by an overwhelming margin of 478 (opposed) – 39 (in favor). The Obama administration has not presented ACTA to Congress or otherwise expressed its intent to ratify the accord.

The law professor letter recounts that “[d]espite the broad public interest in and the effect of similar proposals in the TPP, TPP is following a process even more secretive than ACTA, which is amplifying public distrust and creating an environment conducive to an unbalanced and indefensible final product.” It calls on the administration to “support immediately changing the secretive TPP negotiation process in law and in practice, and follow instead the example set by the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled.”

The Marrakesh Treaty referred to in the letter was the last successful international intellectual property agreement, and it was negotiated through a highly participatory and inclusive process. In that process, all proposals for text for the agreement were shared openly with all stakeholders – unlike in the TPP and ACTA where only a narrow group of industry advisers on so called “Industry Trade Advisory Committees” obtain access to U.S. proposals on an ongoing basis. The end result in the Marrakesh agreement was praised by industry and consumer representatives alike as being a balanced product of a transparent and participatory process.

The law professors admonish that the TPP process, by contrast, “is inconsistent with core United States democratic values; the process should be changed.” The letter makes specific suggestions for Congress and the Administration to give the U.S. public the same information given to select corporate advisers through the ITAC process – which would be required by U.S. law if USTR’s policy making process was covered by the same standards that apply to other agencies through the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Freedom of Information Act. USTR has claimed that its processes are exempt form each of these Watergate era open government laws.

Links to background documents on the issues referenced in the letter may be found at http://infojustice.org/tpp

LINK: LAW PROFESSOR LETTER ON TRANSPARENCY IN THE TPP NEGOTIATION 11/14/2013

 

  15 Responses to “Law Professors Call for Public Process for Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Intellectual Property Chapter”

  1. From the above: The law professors admonish that the TPP process …

    From the referenced letter: We, the undersigned intellectual property law academics and scholars, write to ask you to support immediately changing the secretive TPP negotiation process in law and in practice …

    The TPP chief negotiators and key experts meeting starts today 19 NOV in Salt Lake City and TTBOMK nothing has changed immediately or otherwise. Maybe such persons as the addressees don’t appreciate being admonished.

  2. Yes! Finally someone writes about Internal communications plan.

    Here is my web ite :: Communication in the workplace

  3. Hi, You will find a lot of approaches after visiting your post. I was exactly searching for. Thanks for such post and please keep it up. Great work !! same day flower delivery

  4. On the off chance that you set out to make me think today; mission finished! I truly like you’re composing style and how you express your thoughts. Much obliged to you. best VR games

  5. Easily, the article is actually the best topic on this registry related issue. I fit in with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your next updates. funeral flowers

  6. The Truth About Cellulite Program is designed to target your cellulite and remove it from your body in only 28 days, by using a very simple program. sainsbury flower delivery

  7. Tell us in case you are enthusiastic about this colorway regardless of its design. reclaimruralamerica

  8. The blog or and best That is extremely useful to keep I can share the thoughts
    of the future as this is really what I was looking for, I am very comfortable and pleased to come here. Thank you very much. pink everlast boxing gloves

  9. This is a brilliant blog! I’m very happy with the comments!.. nutribullet pro 900

  10. I as of late ran over your website and have been perusing along. I thought I would leave my first remark. I don’t realize what to say with the exception of that I have delighted in perusing. dunelm bedding sets

  11. Amazing article! I need individuals to know exactly how great this data is in your article. It’s fascinating, convincing substance. Best Money Lender Jurong

  12. I found this one pretty fascinating and it should go into my collection. Very good work! driving horses for sale

  13. I am genuinely grateful to the holder of this tangle usher who has used this astounding paragraph at at this arrange. bitcoin exchange

  14. It is usually wise to time to analyse every one of the business tips and options before choosing anybody. After almost all, you are buying a franchise option that may pay you in the end. isi pulsa online

  15. It is usually wise to time to analyse every one of the business tips and options before choosing anybody. After almost all, you are buying a franchise option that may pay you in the end. driving horses for sale

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


*